Approaches to Improving Nursing Handoffs in Surgical Ward. Open Journal of Nursing

Name: N499 Rubric Capstone NarrativeProficient Outcome Competent Outcome Developing Outcome Points Possible Earned Points PosterAbstract &Introduction1) The abstract has no errors.(3 points)2) The purpose of the proposal is discussed. (3 points)3) The broader goal of the proposal is outlined. (3 points)4) The Evidence-based Practice (EBP) model is introduced and why it was chosen. (3 points)1) The abstract has 2-3 errors.(2 points)2) The purpose of the proposal is discussed. (2 points)3) The broader goal of the proposal is outlined. (2 points)4) The EBP model is introduced and why it was chosen. (2 points)1) The abstract has 4 or more errors.(1 point)2) The purpose of the proposal is discussed. (1 point)3) The broader goal of the proposal is outlined. (1 point)4) The EBP model is introduced and why it was chosen. (1 point)12Supporting Evidencefor Proposal1) Justifies relevance of the problem through evidence-based support.(5 points)2) Fully justifies rationale for the proposed change based on the evidence. (5 points)1) Justification present but incomplete or not relevant to the proposed change.(3 points)2) Rationale unclear or incomplete.(3 points)1) Justification is minimally present or minimally relevant. (1 point)2) Rationale is incoherent or does not relate to the identified problem.(1 point)10Clear and Adequate ContentClear and adequate content in the following areas:1) Description of the problem or need for change/practice change. (7 points)2) Resolution strategy. (7 points)3) Implementation plan. (7 points)4) Evaluation method (7 points)5) Planned process for dissemination of project findings. (7 points)Moderately unclear and/or inadequate content in the following areas:1) Description of the problem or need for change/practice change. (4 points)2) Resolution strategy. (4 points)3) Implementation plan. (4 points)4) Evaluation method (4 points)5) Planned process for dissemination of project findings. (4 points)Missing significant elements of the following areas:1) Description of the problem or need for change/practice change. (2 points)2) Resolution strategy. (2 points)3) Implementation plan. (2 points)4) Evaluation method (2 points)5) Planned process for dissemination of project findings. (2 points)35EBP Model Elements1) All EBP model headings are included in the paper. (5 points)2) The appropriate content is discussed under all EBP model headings.(5 points)1) Some EBP model headings are included in the paper. (3 points)2) Misplaced content is discussed under2-3 EBP model headings. (3 points)1) The EBP model headings are not clear in the paper. (1 point)2) Misplaced content is discussed under 4 or more EBP model heading.(1 point)10Conclusion1) Provides a concise synopsis of the problem and the solution. (4 points)2) Discusses the impact and significance of findings. (4 points)1) Provides an inadequate synopsis of the problem and the solution. (2 points)2) Inadequate discussion of the impact and significance of findings. (2 points)1) Missing key points of the problem and solution in summary. (1 point)2) Missing key points of the impact and significance of findings in the summary. (1 point)8WritingMechanicsDemonstrates proficiency in all of the following areas:1) Clear expression of ideas (3 points)2) Logical flow and organization(2 points)3) Proper writing mechanics (including correct grammar, language, punctuation, and spelling) (3 points)4) Scholarly, formal writing style(2 points)5) Original Work:(less than 15% similarity) (5 points)Demonstrates moderate skills in the following areas:1) Clear expression of ideas (2 points)2) Logical flow and organization(1 point)3) Proper writing mechanics (including correct grammar, language, punctuation, and spelling) (2 points)4) Scholarly, formal writing style(1 point)5) Original Work (less than 25% similarity) (3 points)Needs improvement in the following areas:1) Clear expression of ideas (1 point)2) Logical flow and organization(0 points)3) Proper writing mechanics (including correct grammar, language, punctuation, and spelling) (1 point)4) Scholarly, formal writing style(0 points)5) Original Work (greater than 25% similarity) (1 point)15APA StyleDemonstrates proficiency in all of the following areas:1) Title page and running head in APA style. (2 points)2) References documented in APA style. (2 points)3) At least 4 studies and 3 references are not older than 5 years. (2 points)4) Page length between 5-7 (excluding the title page, abstract, and reference list). (2 points)5) Use Times New Roman and 12 point font. (2 points)Demonstrates moderate skills in the following areas:1) Title page and running head has 1-2 errors. (1 point)2) References has no more than 3 errors(1 point)3) Page length between 5-7 (excluding the title page, abstract, and reference list). (1 point)Needs improvement in the following areas:1) Title page and running head has 3 or more errors. (0 points)2) References have 4 or more errors.(0 points)3) Less than 4 studies and 3 references or references older than 5 years. (1 point)4) Page length is less than or exceeds 5-7 (excluding the title page, abstract, and reference list). (1 point)5) Use Times New Roman and 12 point font. (0 points)10Instructor Comments:Total Score100The following program policy applies:3. Written Assignments and Final Project:a. Are to be submitted by the due date and time.b. Students failing to meet the deadline will receive an automatic 50% reduction on their paper prior to actual grading. If the student fails to submit within the next 24 hours, a grade of “0” will be assigned.c. It is the student’s responsibility to recognize their failure to submit and notify the instructor or teaching assistant within the 24 hour time frame. Contact should be made via email with the late assignmentattached. (This is not for routine use. It is only for late assignments.) Blondon, K.S., Ehrler, F., Le Godais, S., Wojtasikiewicz, J.Y. & Couderc, C. (2017). Approaches to Improving Nursing Handoffs in Surgical Ward. Open Journal of Nursing, 7, 1034- 1043. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojn.2017.79075 Camargo, F. C., Iwamoto, H. H., Galvao, C. M., Monteiro, D. A. T., Goulart, M. B., & Garcia, L. A. A. (2017). Models for the implementation of evidence-based practice in hospital-based nursing: a narrative review. Texto & Contexto-Enfermagem, 26(4), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-07072017002070017 Ford, Y., & Heyman, A. (2017). Patients’ Perceptions of Bedside Handoff: Further Evidence to Support a Culture of Always. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 32(1), 15-24. DOI: 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000201 Foster, C. L. Abraham, S. P., & Gillum, D. R. (2019). Emergency Room Nurses” Views on Bedside Shift Reporting. International Journal of Studies in Nursing, 4(4), 55-69. https://doi.org/10.20849/ijsn.v4i4.677 Melnyk, B. M., & Overholt, E. F. (2019). Evidence-based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare (4th Ed.). Wolters Kluwer. Schipper, K., Bakker, M., De Wit, M., Ket, J. C., & Abma, T. A. (2016). Strategies for disseminating recommendations or guidelines to patients: a systematic review. Implementation Science, 11(1), 82. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0447-x  

"Is this qustion part of your assignmentt? We will write the assignment for you. click order now and get up to 40% Discount"